Digital asset research, held to the same standard
Protocol revenue and fees, derivatives positioning, cycle context and asset profiles. Where a valuation cannot be built from licensable data, the report says so rather than producing a number to fill the space.
Free plan. No card required.
What does crypto research involve?
The same questions as any other asset, asked of a different disclosure regime. What does the thing earn, who holds it, how is it positioned, and what is being paid for it. The difference is that a protocol publishes some of this on-chain in real time and none of it in a standardised filing, so the discipline has to come from the tooling rather than from a regulator.
The specifics
Asset profiles
Supply, issuance, holders and protocol economics per asset, alongside price and liquidity across venues.
Derivatives positioning
Funding, open interest and leverage, which is usually where a move is explained rather than in spot.
Cycle and macro context
Where the asset sits against its own history and against the rates and liquidity backdrop that has driven most of the last decade.
More on thisScreening across assets
Filter the universe on the same kinds of characteristics you would screen equities on, to the extent the data supports it.
Portfolio and tax view
Holdings tracked with a cost basis, and the reporting view that follows from it.
Alerts
Price and positioning conditions, checked continuously.
Two things this deliberately refuses to do
It does not produce a fee multiple or a valuation for an asset whose market capitalisation cannot be sourced under a commercial licence, so the report abstains and states why rather than filling the field. And it is information only: under UK financial promotion rules, digital asset content is presented without encouragement, without performance framing that implies a return, and without the promotional vocabulary those rules exist to restrain. Both constraints cost us a more exciting page and are not negotiable.
Frequently asked questions
Which digital assets are covered?
The major liquid assets across venues, with protocol-level data where the protocol publishes it. Coverage is deliberately narrower than a listings site: an asset with no reliable fundamental data behind it gets a price and little else, and the page says which is which.
Does it give price predictions or recommendations?
No. Digital asset content here is information only. It does not encourage a transaction, it does not present past performance in a way that implies a future return, and it makes no recommendation. That is a regulatory position and also, in this asset class particularly, an honest one.
Why does the report sometimes refuse to value an asset?
Because a valuation needs a market capitalisation, and there is no free source of that data licensable for commercial use. Rather than substitute a number from a source we cannot licence, the report abstains and names the reason. A missing field with an explanation is worth more than a populated one you cannot rely on.
Look at an asset you hold
The dashboard and asset pages are open. See what the data supports and what it does not.